Skip to main content
Use these tools when the user asks “what changed?”, “what happened?”, or “why does this run this way?”

What an observation is

An observation is a captured execution of a process — a real session, attached to a specific process and version. The activity timeline is the underlying sequence of user actions that produced the observation — the systems they used, what they did, when. If you only call one tool from this group, call get_observation_citation on a top observation. It is the closest thing the workspace has to a video replay. It only works for your own sessions.

Common chains

  • State-of-team brief: get_recent_process_changes → drill into specific processes via fetch or get_process_details
  • Deep-dive on a process: get_process_observations (summary mode, scan the friction signals) → pick the most relevant → re-call with verbosity="full" for the narrative, or jump straight to get_observation_citation for the activity timeline
  • Confirm a transformation candidate: get_process_observations for exception patterns → get_observation_citation to confirm the manual pattern with concrete evidence

Cite what you find

Observations have timestamps and version pointers. When the user asks “what’s the evidence?”, surface the observation timestamp and the version it was logged against — that’s a citation the user can audit in Within.

Deviations

Each observation carries the agent’s per-session understanding of how that run compared to the documented process:
  • Positive deviations — places where the user went beyond the documented path in a useful way: a shortcut, a better validation step, a quality-improving move worth promoting.
  • Negative deviations — friction or workarounds: an extra manual step, a retry, a small fix to keep moving.
Both are judgments made in isolation against one session’s activity timeline. Per-session friction often looks routine on its own, so negative_deviations is frequently empty on individual observations even when a pattern is present across many sessions.

How to use deviations

A single observation gives you the single-session view. The signal most teams want — “the same workaround appears on 4 of 5 captures,” “this retry is systemic” — is cross-observation deviation analysis: the surface-level patterns that only emerge when you aggregate across the observation set for a process. Two paths:
  1. Within Advisor does this aggregation natively across the workspace.
  2. MCP-stitched: pull get_observation_citation across the observation set for the process, then diff against the pinned process version yourself. The MCP exposes everything Advisor reads — the cross-observation pass is what you stitch.